Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC coatings. In terms of flare control, I've never seen Pentax get it wrong. Not to worry. By the way, most of these images show superb sharpness and detail. Paul On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:11 PM, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
> Here's a review of the DA* sister lens, the Tokina AT-X PRO 50-135mm > f/2.8 (Japanese): > > Reviews with many samples: > http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/lens_review/2006/12/15/5255.html > > On the field use report: > http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2006/11/21/5079.html > > Can't understand everything, but the main criticism is the bad flare > control. And it mentioned that it would be interesting to see if the > Pentax DA* coating would do better. Someone mentioned that co- > developed > Tokina lenses shared the same SMC coating? I hope not in this case. > > > > > > -- > --Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence -- > --Tungsten T3 Enhanced DIA Keyboard----Nokia Ringtone Convertor-- > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
