jostein, i would say instead of having trying another when there is more light, try with faster film ? it will allow to close down aperture as well ? - needs to be thought over the plusses and minuses. what i feel is taking that shot at night with a bit faster film will give better contrast as well. ... just my thoughts. >From: Jostein Xksne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that work >for me) >Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:04:36 +0200 > >Anand, thanks for the kind words! >All the shots from that night got exactly a little bit too blurry, but >they can pass on the web. If I get a chance to do it again, I would >take a ride when there's a little more light in the sky, and keep the >shutter speeds faster than 2 seconds. Here's the data for the Charing >Cross 1: >Gear: Z-1, FA 50/1.4, tripod. >Film: Kodak E100VS (slide film) >Exposure: 4 seconds at f/2.8, I think... -Maybe f/4? No, I think it's >2.8 >Scan: Minolta Dimage dual (not the II) >Unsharp mask in Photoshop, but otherwise untouched. >Best, >Jostein > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Anand DHUPKAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:33 PM >Subject: Re: More London eye shots (Re: This moths PUG photos that >work for me) > > > > Charing Cross 1 - beautiful shot. too good reflections. > > Which film is it Jostein ? how long was the exposure ? > > btw, which scanner do you use ? >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
