Shel wrote: > Apart from that, I believe the newer models have somewhat better > insulated and more durable electronic connections, and the finish on > the newer bodies is different than that on the older bodies. It's > more matte-like, which I prefer, while possibly being more durable > (just guessing on that one). The newer finish is morer resistant to scratches but more prone to brassing due to wear. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Bruce Dayton
- MZ-S and LX was( MZ-S vs. LX ) Philippe Trottier
- A modern LX (WAS: Re: MZ-S vs. LX) P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Doug Brewer
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Bruce Dayton
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Creature's Comfort
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Mark Cassino
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX Mark Cassino
- RE: MZ-S vs. LX Skofteland, Christian
- RE: MZ-S vs. LX Matamoros, Cesar A.
- RE: MZ-S vs. LX Skofteland, Christian
- Re: MZ-S vs. LX PAUL STENQUIST
- RE: MZ-S vs. LX Cotty
- RE: MZ-S vs. LX Skofteland, Christian

