Because he doesn't have *any* kind of a problem - the camera is functioning correctly. I'd have pointed that out when I saw the first message, but somebody beat me to it.
By now, though, the (lack of) problem has been pointed out, and acknowledged by the original poster. Installing a known good battery would reproduce the problem, so presumably your next recommendation would be to send the camera off for repair? On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:35:59AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > So, what's the problem if not batteries? How are you able to determine > it's not bats unless you install a known good battery and try the camera? > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: John Francis > > > Great idea. Unfortunatelyu he doesn't have a battery problem ... > > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:57:18AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Mike, I'll second Paul's suggestion and further suggest a set of > Energizer > > > Ultimate Lithium (I believe that's what they're called in the UK). They > > > will solve your battery problems simply and effectively. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
