On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Frank Theriault wrote:
> Wow! Where do you get these Markov chain programmes? Can I get one too?
To Frank and all the people who asked about getting this Markov chain
script:
I didn't write the original script. A coworker of mine did. I wouldn't
feel confortable giving it away, since it's not my program.
Besides, it's a powerful weapon, and it would be terrible if it fell
in the wrong hands (you know who you are, guys :-)
I'll look in the web for something similar, or maybe I'll try to write
my own (the one my friend wrote has some limitations I think--it could
and should try to keep sentences a bit more coherent.) If I come up
with something, I'll let you know.
j
PS: Just for fun, here is what the script has to say about autofocus
LXen, manual vs auto cameras, etc:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
While it may not going to the factory workers was simply a chrome
version too :) And that LX in Japan - well, ridiculous. mechanical
engineer I rarely meter anything of what you could just use an
autofocus facade <GD&R>
I would be able to take a new camera, from the camera. Being able to
buy an much and =nobody bought them for the shutter priority could
just remembered my premise that most would like.
More importantly, it won't have a camera? Thanks. There's hardly any
sense to any tonality I agree, this is the last twenty year old parts
for aperture value to 645n.
Then they will be possible without once calling anyone what you can
only a new cameras as "any number large enough to come to shoot with
different meaning and modify your exposure accurately is enough to
tell us what we can probably still compatible with OTF? Nice camera
with OTF?
You're a camera says about everyone on my photography simple and
straightforward. Simply a nerve, Doug ... Only the field, until the
(redesigned) camera that the shutter with a group. And he says about
the camera. Where is an intelligent guy, but I may offer. If I don't
like that.
But in the point that only speculation, and Shel bought one, but I
agree, this is the features that it would 'contribute to the design or
simply a camera it bother me an MZ-S.
Being able to keep a regular built-in spot meter *in addition to* the
last twenty years of these days of aperature value for the 35mm game
is (and it's because it just lock the viewfinder simple, and the
development of concentration, because you have features like a major
design or cause Pentax going to break down you're using spot-metering
this viewfinder!) plus new camera, planned obsolescence, cheap,
second hand market for a camera in today's standards, not combine spot
metering and looks like to 645n.
As for whatever the camera with whatever the LX is pointing at.
Chances are not built from the LX a few things.
You would not define me. How is a non-OTF spot meter on auto
pilot. Todd echoes my intent.
Unfortunately, I rarely meter to cameras these features that an LX
(and other methods.
Oh, and whistles and screens are more opportunity for what to get what
we can only is dominated by significant as opposed to think there is
"what exposure then by switching to keep the LX production came.
Well... well, ridiculous. Thanks.
That was even think it define me. want more important to use, nor am
I seriously doubt they be a PZ-1p or use center-weighted metering with
unecessary features severly compromises the (redesigned) camera from
the list members didn't know you do in the choice of whining that
adding only speculation, and whistles and less busy viewfinder blind
compared to an offer.
Regardless of the LX with many would ever use such as the
addition to* the LX back under the standards it worth buying (and
other improvements like anyone what is very small market as AF, spot
meter *in addition to* the usual question among pros shooting side is
one more than the camera that bastardizing an offer.
I've never know you be more like anyone a camera that are more like
adding only add AF is dominated by the price down its operation'. Is
there a regular built-in motorized transport then uses that th is
quite big). :(
You`re so poorly that again. Whats left of features they may even
think it doesn't bother you have interchangeable viewfinders. This
keeps the (redesigned) camera was loaded with AF to break down a
smiley after "techno-weenie"?
No real photographer would like Super or even think there were wrong?
Aperture priority mode. mechanical engineer I won't have to the SFX
or simply a totally new camera, planned obsolescence, or go into
production."
That said, Olympus is currently reading somewhere a 'reasonably well
done viewfinder').
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at http://www.jbuhler.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
