On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 01:48:00 EDT, you wrote:
>
>And John, why do (did) ~you~ continue the thread?
>
>Mafud
Jeez, Mafud, I dood (did) continue the thread because
it was fun. For those without a fun-meter, read my
constructive, well crafted long explanation below:
It is elegantly ironic that (a) someone could throw
down the gauntlet saying, in effect, that an email's
innerds could not be forged (although I doubt that
person even knew the subtle implication of the
statement generating this effect, and may not know that
email has innerds, given the AOL-ness of the
situation), and (b) someone else could take up the
email innerds challenge quite easily, and (c) the
person in ~a~ above could fail to see the forgery ~b~
when it appeared, nor the humor in its posting, and (d)
all of the above are true.
Any ~^problem^~ with that?
BTW, (which BTW stands for BTW) why did "you" continue
the thread? I thought >>never complain, never explain<<
would be a watchword.
Disclaimer P.S> : BTW this post may or may not come
from me, depending on the internet gremlins. Contact
your AOL service provider for authentication before
sending money.
--
John " Indigents don't use disposable cameras" Mustarde
--
Happy Trails,
Texdance
http://members.fortunecity.com/texdance
http://members1.clubphoto.com/john8202
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
