Reads as though you understand exactly what I'm contending, thus confirms our total agreement.
Jack --- Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i assumed using the very best lenses available already. that's only > the > starting point for producing an top quality digital print. a superb > quality > digital capture isn't going to look very good straight out of the > camera. > the RAW file needs to be adjusted before it brings out all of the > things > that the photographer envisioned before they tripped the shutter. if > the > photographer hasn't learned yet just how different they can be and > just > expects the camera's settings to do the work, they are losing much of > the > potential capabilities of their camera. for the highest quality work, > taking > the time to postprocess is an essential part of the production of a > print. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:24 PM > Subject: Re: LD Elements > > > > Herb, > > Forgive me, but I can't decide if you agree with me or not. > > I'm primarily referring to image resolution, once limited by the > > optics. Doesn't mean, of course, every photog took full advantage > of > > their quality. > > Conclusion: All else being equal, a better quality lens still > results > > in a sharper image..if that's what the shooter wants. > > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
