Hi Dave -

I'm still on my second set of Energizer Lithiums - I bought an 8 pack at the local Walgreens.

So far I have 794 exposures on this set - everything on this set and the last was RAW. I have the LCD set for a 5 second post-view of the shots, I don't do much review for sharpness in camera (with the subjects I'm shooting there is little chance to re-do) but I do check the histogram now and then and eyeball the post-view to make sure the exposure is not totally wonked - a slip of the flash in the hotshoe can result in TTL malfunctioning, but I usually detect that when I hear a full discharge of a flash that I expect to be just doing fill.

I think the non-af and non-rtf really stretch the batteries.

- MCC

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: 1471 On Lithium


Mark.
My first set of Lithiums went from about frame 60 to about frame 1000,with some RTF and
50/50 af,mf.

I bought a set of duracell 2050's and they lasted about 400 frames. Mostly raw files this
time around
anf some RTF.

Dave

   > A while back I posted a few questions about
battery consumption with the
*ist-D.  At that time Godfrey and some others suggested using Lithium AA
batteries, so I gave it a try.

It's been a few weeks, and to my surprise I got to 1471 shots before the low battery indicator came on. I changed out the set then, even though I could
probably squeeze some more shots out of them. (The lithium's are now in a
flash unit, and seem to be working adequately, though not on par with fresh
batteries.)

That's almost entirely manual focus shooting with virtually no use of the
RTF - but I've come round to the opinion that the Lithium's are the way to
go. Thanks to all who offered up their advice!

- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -






Reply via email to