What Kostas says is correct, but there are 4 possible "advantages" to
getting a Spotmatic as opposed to a KM.  1st, the Super-Takumars and the
SMC Takumars tend to be less expensive than the K mount lenses.  Second, in
my view the build quality or feel of the old screw mount lenses is better
than the (still very excellent) K, M, and A lenses.  Third, Spotmatics are
pretty cheap.  Finally, you might like the aesthetics of the Spotmatics
more than the KM, etc.

I have a couple of Spotmatics and I continue to use them even though I have
more recent Pentax SLRs (K1000, LX, and MX).

Aaron Bransky


>>>>>Can I make a suggestion? People who have had and cherished both,
suggest that the early bayonet cameras are late Spotmatics with a different
mount; the KM is I think is mentioned as a prime example. 

http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/bodies/K/

The advantage of these cameras is that they work with the vast majority of
Pentax bayonet lenses produced even today. With an adapter they also accept
screwmount lenses (in stop-down metering mode). 

Just a thought,

Kostas<<<<<<

Reply via email to