Yes, much better. I was surprised at how much can be accomplished with Highlights and Shadows when I first started working with CS2. So,o;ar effects can undoubtedly be rendered with Curves and mask applications, but it's much more difficult. I believe, however, that Adobe claims that S & H can effect changes that can't be fully achieved with other tools.
> I believe this edition is better. "Highlights and Shadows" is an excellent > tool! > http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/22413793/ > Regards > Jens > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 29. juni 2005 18:55 > Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Emne: RE: PESO: Gay Festival, Oslo 2005 > > > True, Godfrey. > And the *ist D doesn't offer fill flash options :-( > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 29. juni 2005 18:50 > Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Emne: Re: PESO: Gay Festival, Oslo 2005 > > > > On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a backlit daylight shot, fill flash won't leave a shadow. It's > > really the best option for a shot like this, but is somewhat of a > > pain to execute. > > Um, I disagree about the shadow, but I suppose it depends on just how > much flash fill you use. Most people seem to overdo it. > > Godfrey > > >
