Thank you Mark, You are a prim(e)rose :-)
Have thanked you off list, but want to express my gratitude public too.

I am impressed. Impressed by two things. First the thing that you have made
time to test out this combination, for me a new member of the list. A
troublesome member too ;-)

I'm also impressed by the quality of this rather cheap lens combo. Ritch
colours, contrast lookes ok, there are good details both in center and
corners, the bokeh also lookes rather pleasant. The only "error" I see is a
bit of CA(?), but nothing I can't live with. I'm not sure CA is the correct
term, what I see is something purple here and there. 

Using a monpod I am rather convinced it will do the job at the socker event,
if the light don't fail me. This combination is a bit on the slow side.

I'm also looking forward to test it out on the seabirds I have near my
house. Bird people claim there are at least 37 different species. I believe
they haven't been documented photographically before. These birds are
threathened by a very dangerious speciment, people with money, who wants
more money (meaning building ugly shoping centers). A documentation might
slow them down. 


Tim
Not drunk, just plain Norwegian.

Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds 
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28. juni 2005 13:28
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: TCs on digital

Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Thanks a lot Mark. You're a prime!

Here's more: Actual photos!
I did a very quick shoot in the garden last night. Light was getting low
so I just got off a couple of shots at 210mm (that's 357mm with the
teleconverter, the equivalent of 535mm on a film camera!), 1/8th second
and f/4.5 (f/7.7 because of the teleconverter) with the camera resting
on the arm of a chair. There was a bit of a breeze, but I selected the
100% crop area from a group of plants that seemed to be pretty
motionless and that were within the very thin depth of field.
Here's the full frame (the entire scene), resized for the web:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/fullfram.jpg
Here's a 100% crop (actual pixels):
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/crop.jpg
I converted the RAW files in Photoshop. Very small amount of unsharp
mask applied after conversion.

Given the relatively wide aperture, DOF and the long exposure time, I'm
*very* impressed with the results. I'll have to try some tripod-mounted
shots with smaller apertures soon.



-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com





Reply via email to