Mark Roberts wrote:
Daniel Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, just want to get some opinions. I'm planning on getting an istds
and a 28mm prime, and I like to do low-light work. Which lens would
you pick, the sigma 28mm 1.8 or the FA pentax 28mm 2.8? I'm used to
shooting at a very crappy-looking iso400 on a canon g3 at f/2, but I
figure i'll be getting a usable iso400-1600 (at last! haha). Is the
extra stop (stop and half?) worth it? They seem to be the same price
around the internet. Thanks.
I've never used the Sigma but I will confirm that the Pentax FA 28/2.8AL
is an excellent lens.
Then there's the Pentax 31/1.8 Limited...
I have the Pentax one myself; bought it a few months ago to be my
"normal" lens on the *ist D. I shoot mostly indoors without flash, but
my "low-light" may not be the same as your "low-light" of course.
I had a Sigma lens once (not the one you're asking about) and don't plan
to ever buy another Sigma lens.
ERNR
