I have the older Sigma 14mm - the 14mm f3.5.  I've been pretty satisfied with it, though it's not something I use very often.  Here's a cat photo taken with it:

http://www.net-link.net/~cassino/stuff/01010702pandora_e1.jpg

The SMC F 17-28 fisheye zoom is a really interesting lens, but the fisheye effect is not always what's needed.  But it sure is a lot of fun to work with.

On the cheap side of things, I recently picked up a Vivitar Series 1 19-35mm zoom.  The test roll I shot looks OK and it was cheap - someday to be replaced by the FA 20-35 f4 AL...

- MCC

At 07:42 PM 6/4/01 +0200, you wrote:

I have been saving up to buy a good ultra wide angle lens.  Below is my shortlist (in no particular order).

- PENTAX SMC-FA 20-35mm f/4 AL
- PENTAX SMC-FA 20mm f/2.8
- SIGMA 20mm f/1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF
- SIGMA 14mm f2.8 EX Aspherical
- SIGMA 17-35mm f2.8-4 EX Aspherical

Since whatever I choose the investment will be substantial, I would like some expert advice on the issue. My priorities are as follows:

1) Sharpness (duh!)

2) Good rendition of out of focus areas.

3) As little barrel/pincushion distortion as possible.

4) Good resistance to flare.

5) Non rotating front element.  - I frequently use a circular polariser and other Cokin P System filters.

6) Fast Maximum Aperture - Since I will stop down the lens to f8 or f11 in most situations this is not absolutely essential.

7) Zoom - desirable but not essential.

Any words of wisdom / personal experience will be very apreceated.  I would also be interested in positive experiences with lenses other than those on my shortlist.

My camera is a Pentax MZ5n

Regards
Patrick

- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - -
Photos:
http://www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - -

Reply via email to