JT> I have considered the FA 135 f2.8. The F version, however, rates better JT> on Photodo. Looking closely at the numbers, the main difference is that JT> the F is sharper at f2.8. Why? Anyway, if I decide to get one, I will JT> look for a used F 135.
Graywolf summed it up nicely. Optical formulas are just guides, the
lens may be much different.
And I really don't want to resurrect the threads about Photodo...
Good light!
fra
