I have never read an article with so many contradictory terms and statements in my life. If I read this under different circumstances I would think it a rather well written joke. I detect either a strong political or wealthy/not wealthy influence here. Utter nonsense, invasion of privacy in a public place. "Beach voyeurism", but no mention of "beach exhibitionism". It's OK to show 'em, just don't look (or photograph). This world is truly going bananas!
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT Paranoia and stupid legislation is reserved for the US only > :-( > > > So now when I shoot at a local public beach I guess have to be very very > careful: > > http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/11/10/1100021861161.html?on eclick=true Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
