P� 14. nov. 2004 kl. 00.15 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Dag said: (among other things) --
Of course the situation is more detailed.  Among other things it
depends on when you lost the stereoscopic vision (I lost mine at the
worst time, around 2-3), if you have any cooperation between the eyes
at all (I don�t, some do) and a lot on practice.  I did manage to play
table tennis after a lot of training, but only back hand.

Fast downhill skiing is something else, I do that too.  Usually you
know how far away the slope is, because you know where your feet are.
Jumping between boulders on trips into the mountains is dangerous,
because it is difficult to see the how big a rock is.  The difference
between 50cm and 150cm height hurts, especially with 20 kilos on your
back...

I don't think I ever had binocular vision.
Know exactly what you mean about jumping rocks ... and I'm not terribly
confident going downhill in unfamiliar territory in flat light.
What was also interesting was when I tried skeet shooting. From some stations I
could hit the target beautifully; some stations were hit and miss; and from one
station I never even *saw* the target.

Sounds familiar, even the shooting. I think I found that it depended on which eye I used, but I didn�t experiment much.


A nice think is that I think it gives us an advantage in photography, because we see the same as the camera :-)

DagT




Reply via email to