Sorry 'bout the second look, Shel. I had to delete the older ones due to the same file names. I'll make better test in colour some day. Right now a friend has my 35mm lens, since I don't use it much.
I did some test comparing Pentax F 35-80mm, Tokina AT-X 2.6-2.8/28-70mm and the Tokina 2.8-4.3/28-70mm. I couldn't really tell the difference from digital images (*ist D)! The resolution of the *ist D sensor seems to put a stop to things long before the lenses do... Hmmm... I guess I'll have to compare some slides on a screen instead! Jens Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 13. november 2004 03:18 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: SMCP A 35/2.8 any good? I guess we have different ideas about what is acceptable ... from what I can see the lens is not very usable @ 2.8, except in certain situations, due to light fall off, and, of course, sharpness is difficult to judge on a computer screen. I went back to take another look at the full size pics and received a message that the foto was no longer on the site. So much for taking another look ;-)) Let's just agree to disagree. Mine's gone and I don't care if I ever see it again. I would not feel that way about the K35/3.5, or any number of other lenses. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 11/12/2004 2:48:45 PM > Subject: RE: SMCP A 35/2.8 any good? > > You're right, it's not a scientific test. As I recall it was a cloudy day > and the light conditions very changing rapidly. If you watch the shots in > Full Size,F5.6 still looks good. > Anyway, I think the test shows that the lens is doing pretty well even at > 2.8. > I'll post test shots showing buidings, shortly. If it's desireable I don't > know, it depends on the avaliable alternatives, sippose. > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 12. november 2004 22:01 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: RE: SMCP A 35/2.8 any good? > > > Looks a lot better @ 4.0 than @ 5.6, but, more interesting is that each > shot is framed differently leading me to think that this test was not done > on a tripod or that the camera was placed in a stable, steady manner. The > very dark left side, which is lacking detail shown @ 4.0 and 5.6 makes me > wonder about the exposure accuracy, although it may just be the substantial > light falloff that's creating the effect. Overall, based on these pics, > I'll stand by my comment that the lens is not very desirable. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 11/12/2004 12:38:47 PM > > Subject: RE: SMCP A 35/2.8 any good? > > > > Test shots done with the Pentax SMC M 2.8/35mm posted here (f2.8): > > http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p9076464.html > > > > click next to see f4 and f5.6. > > Cheers > > Jens > > >
