Hi, Friday, November 12, 2004, 2:31:45 PM, J. wrote:
> But my point is that it isnt ***artistically*** or technically > accurate. It's a pure misnomer that shouldn't be used IMHO. > JCO the same thing applies to stereography, which you yourself have described as 3D (if I read you correctly). It is not 3D, artistically or technically - it is a pair of 2D images which can appear to have 3 dimensions through an optical trick. -- Cheers, Bob
