That's OK, I'm so tired it made sense to me the way it was! ;-) Don
> -----Original Message----- > From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 3D quality in a lens? > > > just=such, wow I really need a proof reader.... > :) > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 3D quality in a lens? > > > If you have ever done or seen any decent > 3D photography you would know it's a really > dumb way to describe any 2D image. I wouldnt > read too much into it, or put too much trust > in the writers of just descriptions... > JCO > > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:23 PM > To: PDML > Subject: 3D quality in a lens? > > > What is meant when a lens is described as having > a "great 3 dimensional quality"? > Or "it gives photos a 3 dimensional feel"? > I've heard this term used several times in describing > lenses, mostly WA's. > How does a lens lend a 3D quality to a photograph? > > TIA > Don >
