I didn't assume it, I stipulated it! I said DIGITAL IMAGES. Unscanned negatives are not digital images.... There is a difference between stipulation and assumption.
JCO -----Original Message----- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Concerns About Moving to Digital (Quality of istD) That assumes one is scanning and digitizing negatives. And even so, it still can be a time consuming process if you want to do a good, careful, and thorough cleanup. At least for me it is. Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > dust isnt much of an issue anymore with film or sensor sourced digital > images because it is so easy to clean up with photoshop ( unless its > absurdly large or numerous). > > Its not like the old days where dust in a wet darkroom > could easily drive you to insanity because it was so > hard to eliminate completely. With digital editing > it can be removed 100% without too much effort at all..... > > JCO
