JCO, you take any statement and twist it so that it opposes or is wrong from
any point of view you believe in. how you can live in such paranoia is
beyond me. we are talking about implemented hardware and that imposes lots
of assumptions that i am not going to enumerate every time.

Herb...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: USAF target and resolution tests


> Wouldn't the theroretical SNR be infinity??? when noise = ZERO!
>
> If you mean the therotical SNR of the physical sensor than there
> is a noise level to deal with and the number of bits required
> is not irrelavant.


Reply via email to