frank theriault wrote: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:30:08 -0500, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Frank, > > I would probably have cropped this a bit tighter as I don't feel the rest > > of what is shown in the image really adds. > > If a dog can look sad that one surely does. > > Thanks for your thoughts, Ken, > > If I were inclined to crop this one, I'd certainly want to get rid of > a good chunk of the grass in front of the dog, and maybe most or all > of the fellow on the right. Actually, maybe I'll go do that right > now - just hang on a minute... > > Thanks for waiting. Here's the cropped version: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2854381 > > Just so's ya can compare it, here's the full-frame version: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2851649 > > Feel free to express a preference, or try it yourself (I'm sure most > here could do better than me). > > thanks, > frank > > > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Yeah - cropped better - I might have left a little more grass, tho... But I liked it to begin with. ann
