William Robb caused this message to magically appear on my monitor this AM -

> So, to be fair, if we are going to chastise some people for "street 
> photography", we should also castigate those who choose to take prety 
> pictures of mountain ranges, since they must have a political agenda 
> as well.

Seems like a good reason to give up photography all together.   <VBG> 


Kenneth Waller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Breakfast in Bed


> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Keith Whaley"
> Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Breakfast in Bed
> 
> 
> 
> > This sort of crap is totally absurd.
> > Shel's image is at the heart of photography, and historically 
> > always has been.
> > The entire span of publishing photographic images is not to please 
> > everybody's taste for knowing what the world is like, but to record 
> > it. Were it not for the unique eye and recording efforts of many 
> > photographers, the world would be more ignorant of the "human 
> > condition," wherever it exists, and for whatever reason.
> > The only "statement" that Shel, or any other image maker is making 
> > is, "Here is what _I_ saw, and now I show it to you. I'm not asking 
> > you to like it. It is what it is. What you do with the thoughts 
> > that arise when you view it, that's entirely up to you. I've done 
> > my job, which is portraying the world as I saw it..."
> >
> 
> Since people seem to object to the less than pretty pictures as 
> having a "political agenda", I think someone (me, I guess) should 
> point out that one of the most popular and prolific "landscape 
> photographers" had a very powerful political motivation when he was 
> out taking his work.
> Ansel Adams was a very strong proponent of the US National Park 
> system, and was, IIANM, responsible for the formation of more than 
> one National Park, through lobbying and sometimes more direct 
> intervention with the political process.
> 

> 
> Or, we could cut the bullshit and accept that people will photograph 
> what they will photograph, and will post links to the list, hopefully 
> with the occassioanl warning that the picture isn't meant to please 
> everyone.
> 
> William Robb 
> 
> 

Reply via email to