I think the profile shot was at f11. The head-on was definitely f16. The chrome is white because I put white cardboard on the ground. Without that, it would be reflecting the asphalt, which is really ugly. Been there, done that :-).
Paul
On Oct 25, 2004, at 7:45 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:


On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Alan Chan wrote:

Applies to me as well. Btw, I think the 2nd shoot was cropped a little too
tight, particular too little space on the top. Maybe it's the 400mm effect,
it looks a little uncomfortable, to me anyway. :-)

I agree with the above. I also get the illusion that the car is lookint at me full on, while it's evident from the tyres that this is not the case. Again 400 effect?

I think the first is excellent, including the white top. It's as if
something is illuminating the car, stealing the show off the pretty
autumn trees. The chromes also work, unlike the first picture where
the reflections give the impression the bumper is white. Do you recall
the aperture when you took the sideways picture?

Thanks for sharing,

Kostas




Reply via email to