If you publish for , let's say commercial purposes - asveticing, you need permission. If people say or give a sign meaning "no photographs", photographing in spite of this is illeagal.
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 25. september 2004 21:31 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: No more photography in Europe? Hi, Saturday, September 25, 2004, 8:03:59 PM, DagT wrote: > This is not the way it is interpreted here. They only conclude that > the royals have some right to privacy. > Usually, you can photograph anywhere and anybody, but you can�t publish > without permission if the person is important or dominant in the > picture and the theme is not of any special public interest. This was > the same before the verdict. that's not the way it is/was in the UK. If you take a photograph of somebody in a public place then you don't need their permission to pulish. Now we will have to enact this stupid ruling. -- Cheers, Bob
