Peter, thanks for looking & commenting. You're correct about the lens comment. I've shot enough animal dots with less lens to really appreciate the 600mm.
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter J. Alling" Subject: Re: PAW: Action in Denali > If he'd shot it with a shorter lens the wolf probably wouldn't have been > there, they are quite shy and usually very afraid of humans, (with good > reason). > It is a great shot by the way. > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > Wow! Great shot, Ken. I took one look and thought, "Whoa, hope he shot > > that with the 600." At least it wasn't a hungry wolf. Looks like the > > bird is going to get the tender meat between those ribs. You have to > > print this one big, really big. Is it cropped? > > Paul > > On Sep 16, 2004, at 4:52 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > > > >> Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html > >> to see > >> where I spent my last two weeks. > >> > >> Shot 18 rolls of Velvia/Provia 400F & 1350 digital images with the * > >> ist D. > >> Mostly with a 600mm FA and a 300MM FA. > >> > >> Comments solicited. > >> > >> WARNING: This image is a strong statement of the ways of nature. If > >> you're > >> not into red meat, don't look! > >> > >> Kenneth Waller > >> > > > > > > > -- > I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. > During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings > and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. > --P.J. O'Rourke > >
