Probably just some artifacts of my "quick and dirty" dust removal. If I were to print this I would go in and clean it up a bit more. But even as it is a 8x10 wouldn't show any of that stuff, too small.
I forgot to mention, while your monitor size and screen resolution will cause your milage to vary, On my 17" monitor with 1280x960 resolution, the scan I posted is 28"x36" dimentions, POSTER SIZE! I suggest you print it in the 11x14 to 14x17 print size to get some idea of how good a 2.5MB file can print. Its pixels more than anything else, NOT MB that really determines quality. That image is about 12 real ( not interpolated ) Mpixels. JCO -----Original Message----- From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. The detail is amazing JCO. Nice pic. What are those "swirls" in the sky portion? Are they some type of artifact of scanning? rg J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Take a look at this Antonio, > http://www.jcoconnell.com/temp/barge12mp.jpg > or even better, print it at 8x10 or 11x14 > on high quality glossy paper. > > I think you will find it quite different than > those old 35mm photos posted in the PUG. > > As far as "knowing it all", no one does but > I do not post on things I know nothing about > and I have very strong opinions on things > I know a lot about. You are a presumptuous > fool to be making silly claims based on my old > 35mm images, the very ones I TOLD you are > no good, when I am claiming the LF is the > way to go. You make no sense. > JCO > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Antonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 4:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. > > > Don, I do not put myself across as an expert on matters > photographical. I have an opinion, yes - but I am willing to be proven > wrong on the discussions I take part in. > > JCO on the other hand thinks he knows it all and keeps harping on > about quality all the time. Looks like he talks the talk but cant walk > the walk looking at the images he has posted. They have to be some of > the worst quality images I have seen on the web. Where is the quality > JCO? > > > A. > > > > > > > On 29/8/04 10:45 pm, "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Really, has anyone ever seen an AA pic? >>As rare as him posting a message that isn't a derogatory "re"! >> >>Keep pluggin' quality JCO, before we all forget it's important. :-( >> >>Don >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 3:37 PM >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. >>> >>> >>>I know, JCO... :-) >>> >>>Still looking forward to AA's pics, though... >>> >>>Cheers, >>>Jostein >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 10:27 PM >>>Subject: RE: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi-Rez LF images cant be seen on a PC screen without downsizing them >>>>to death. All the details are gone when they are reduced to fit on a > > >>>>computer screen. The only way to appreciate them is on >>>>a big print in person. Most of the links below >>>>are old 35mm and P67 shots. I post LF stuff once >>>>and a while on f32.net now which is a LF forum but >>>>not to discuss/display image quality. >>>>JCO >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 4:13 PM >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: Re: 35 vs digi - Some points to ponder. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Antonio wrote: >>>> >>>>>JCO you seem to be obsessed with image quality, but I have yet to >>>> >>>>see a >>>> >>>>>quality image from you. Why is that? >>>> >>>>Probably because you didn't bother to look in the first place. PUG >>> >>>is >>> >>>>always a good place to start: http://pug.komkon.org/02mar/peir2.html >>>>http://pug.komkon.org/02may/hbinlets.html >>>>http://pug.komkon.org/03jan/sun2pug.html >>>>http://pug.komkon.org/03mar/pug0203.html >>>>http://pug.komkon.org/99aug/PEL_2SM.htm >>>>http://pug.komkon.org/archive/oconnell.html >>>> >>>> >>>>By the way, I can't recall to have seen any of your online images, >>> >>>and >>> >>>>Google didn't help me either. Do you have a link to share? >>>> >>>>Jostein >>>> >>>> >>> > >
