Odd, I use two of them for weddings all the time. I pretty much find AF in general not useful/needed during a wedding shoot. Didn't matter if I was shooting my old PZ-1p's, MZ-S's, P67II's or the *istD's. Seems like a strong reliance on AF when not necessary. I only use AF when I am not capable of focusing manually - That situation hasn't happened at a wedding yet.
I think the *istD makes a great wedding/portrait camera. -- Best regards, Bruce Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 1:32:13 PM, you wrote: SP> On Aug 24, 2004, at 6:38 PM, Brendan wrote: >> I'm not so sure that the *istD is that bad vs the >> competion, it's sure slower than the Pz-20 but it does >> focus accurately, so long as nothing moves! SP> So it makes it useless for low light action reportage (like wedding) SP> photography. SP> -- SP> Best regards SP> Sylwek
