Hi, > Of course there are good reason for photograph terrible deeds but > when these photographs are being "marketed" or published as "art" in > spite of being accidental snapshots, not a product of an unique or > sensitive vision, the whole thing becomes highly speculative,
perhaps you could back up your claims by citing some specific examples of journalistic photos that are marketed or published as art but are in fact accidental snapshots. > as > often is the case with excessive violence in the media. the violence is not in the media, it is in the world. -- Cheers, Bob
