of similar quality available today for less that $200. (That's US dollars). At the rate these people
are charging you'd pay for the scanner in about 10-20 conversions. I'd get the scanner. You make
no mention of resolution. Unless they are giving you scans of greater that 9MP you would do better
with even the least expensive film scanner, or flat bed with a film adapter.
David Schneider wrote:
<BL> Do post some PUGs, some PAWs and some OTs... <g>
Well, funny you should mention that... <grin>
My current set up is a Pentax Super Program and an Olympus digital. I would be happy to post pictures from the Pentax, but they are all, of course, in 35mm. I found a place by me that will convert the 35mm to digital, but they want $18 for 1, something like $24/2, and some sliding scale like that by scanning the negative. This is not really cost effective (read: possible) for me.
Is there a way to get the 35mm to digital cheaper than that?
Or, is a scanner the way to go, and I should just be scanning the pictures? I don't HAVE a scanner, but hey, that's what excuses are for aren't they?
david
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 7/29/2004
