'Closed in'? How do you mean exactly? I love the images I see thru my 5n! I'd love to check out a PZ-1 if it gets any better. Although very unlikely I'd consider switching.. Just nice to see what other people like using.
Cheers, Ryan ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 5:19 PM Subject: Re: MZ50 (or maybe 60) vs MZ5n viewfinder > One of the reasons i went with the PZ-1 over the 5n was the finder.I felt the 5n was to > 'closed in' for my > liking. > I'll be interested in the *istD response's as i'm very close to looking at one. > > Dave Brooks > > > I was just comparing the viewfinder between my 5n and > a friend's 50. I was a > > bit amazed to discover that my 5n's viewfinder has gives everything a rather > > warm (or woody) cast, while the 50 had a bluish (or tinny) cast, and I > > didn't get the same satisfaction composing with it (even though it probably > > was of no consequence to the produced image). > > > > If you're wondering, I did swap lenses to make sure, it wasn't the lenses. > > > > Anyway, I just had the horrible thought that maybe some newbie slightly > > interested in photography might pick up a relatively cheap body like a 50, > > and because of the less than satisfactory viewfinder, not get as into > > photography as he/she could have been otherwise. > > > > Anybody notice the viewfinder difference too? Any thoughts? > > > > Regards, > > Ryan > > > > PS Anybody want to compare their ist D viewfinder (woody? tinny? something > > else perhaps?) to their film viewfinders? > > > > > > > > >
