Hi,
   I just got back home, from my trip to Romania, so I decided to
   check on the list :) Except some photographs from the trip, but not
   too soon - I have returned that early because of an unexpected
   assignment this weekend, and I plan to go abroad again start of
   August - this time former Yugoslavia.

   Trip was great, I solo hitchhiked from Czech republic to Romania and
   back, which was excellent for meeting some nice people on the road
   (people are quite friendly when they see a lone foreigner who does
   speak their language a little). After taking an all-night drive
   with a Spanish-Romanian truck driver to the city of Deva, I met up
   with my friends who were already there, in a nice stroke of luck,
   when they saw me from a truck they hiked and stopped. This time (my
   second in Romania), we didn't go to the high mountains but stayed
   in the lower mountains, at around 1300m. Made new friends, met
   interesting people, as always. I didn't do much nature photography,
   I think I haven't made a single "nature" frame. Most of the great
   national-geographic nature shots seem too sterile to me. Looking
   exceptional, yes, but not telling you that much how it is really
   there. For that, I like the photographs of people. Which I did a
   lot. All on B&W, so it will take some time before I scan some
   prints. The whole trip, especially for being solo for the "road"
   part of it, was very enlightening, for me, but I think also for the
   friendly people we met. In the good way. Great hospitability. The
   average people are far more hospitable and friendly than in the
   "West". More lively. West is afraid, sterile... Of course I met
   great people there as well, but not so much of them. Most of the
   people on this list are very good and hospitable too, I can see
   just from the GFM reports.

   The people are very hospitable, but that brings a risk of ruining
   their way of life. Global tourism has maybe destroyed more cultures
   than many recent wars. There is no reciprocity with the "western"
   tourist // "western" meaning the typical wealthy tourist who stays
   in hotels etc., not a geographic meaning 'per se'.//. No
   enlightening for both sides. He just tosses off money, offering
   nothing but money in return for the hospitality, corrupting the
   traditional reciprocal relations. While his money helps the
   economy, most of it goes away to foreign touristic investors,
   infrastucture that's only for tourists like McDonald chains which
   they need because "I would not eat the dirty food there", and such.

   I have seen tourist city centers in Romania which looked just like
   the ones in Prague, Wien or Paris (meaning: sterile, ugly,
   burgeause, making you puke). And few backstreets away, there was only
   the poor. Not longer hospitable, because now you are not a
   "pilgrim", but a member of the "tourist" class. Even if you are
   only slightly less poor than them.

      I hate the tourist crowds in Prague, the whole tourist center. It's like
   Madame Tussaud's - city modelled in vax, vax museum, Franz Kafka
   streets artifically made in vax, no longer alive, no longer
   enlighteningly dangerous, no longer a living city... Sterilised by
   countless boutiqus and Franz Kafka tours and "See the Golem" signs
   and brothels and ..., and ... . You really hate it when it happens to
   your city, and you equally hate it when you see it elsewhere.

   And what the tourists bring back home? Memories of hotel rooms (the
   same because it's Holiday Inn or RAS or whatever chain), "local
   cuisine" tourist restaurants, some sights which they take the same
   ugly kitch pictures as thousands of others. "indigenous" dances and
   music performing before hotels and on the plazas, dances and music
   which once had a ritual meaning, sacred meaning, but now are
   performed only for the money. But in the soul, nothing, nothing.
   And they leave nothing, nothing. No one benefits. Both loose.
   Stereotypes are only strengthened.

   It's hard to travel the other way. You will break a lot of
   sterotypes. You will learn new things, which isn't always pleasant.
   You will meet good people and bad people. You cannot decline
   their hospitablity, even though knowing that they are offering
   their best and rarest. "God return it to you, kind hosts" no longer
   works now. You can stay and help, but often, you, unexperienced
   worker, do more harm than help. You can give them money, but that's
   the whole point - that's not totally bad for any culture. You can
   entertain them. When you are at least a bit friends, you can offer
   to go and buy some provisions which you have eaten so foolishly.
   You can invite them to you, which is harder, because most such
   people do not have the time or resources to travel Europe to visit
   you. I don't know. As with most things in life, it's a decision
   hard to decide. But it's better to make friends than just hosts.

   When I was younger, Czechoslovakia was a communist country. Most
   tourists came, who saw the city like a zoo. They saw only
   the "exhibit". Zoo. Apes in a cage. Others came, mostly young
   leftists, artists. They brought ideas, music, exchanged ideas.
   Helped. They broke their sterotypes, and broke ours as well. They
   learned that not all under Communism was great, as most young
   thought in the West. They spoke of it back home. They were friends,
   guests, not tourists. When we now hosted the children from
   Chechnya, some people here looked at them the same way. Apes in a
   cage. Stereotypes. Muslims. Terrorists. Apes. Others looked with
   their heart, and learned a big lot. So the hosts can learn a lot
   too, if you are a good guest.
   
   I will end. I don't know what I wanted to say anyway, or who I am
   saying it to. Some will understand, some will not. That's it. It
   was perhaps the return home which made me sad, bringing back memories of
   being a host myself, hosting guests from Chechnya, children from
   the refugee camps who fled from the war there. And how miserable
   and angry and helpless I felt when they left, and I was walking
   trough the centre of Prague, with the adverts and hotels and
   tourists knowing nothing... the whole machine going on and on.

      Our friends in Romania asked how we liked the country. I had to say
   (truthfully), that it was a great experience, and beautiful. And
   that I will speak of it when I return back. So here it is :) Next
   time you hear that the migrant workers from Romania or Ukraine or
   whatever "eastern" country are thieves and mafians, don't believe
   it :) We are neither, and it was said about Czechs in the West
   as well. The Romanian culture is ancient, its artists and writers
   famous (but maybe more by their country of refuge - mostly France -
   than their country of origin). And the people are great. Yes there
   were bad ones. But where aren't? And the good ones were very
   helpful.

   Thus, try not to be a tourist next time you go abroad. Be an
   interested but humle observer, be a friend. Be prepared to be shocked, to
   have your stereotypes broken, to think. From what I know of the
   people on this list, you are not tourists that much :-) so I am sorry
   for saying something obvious. But as I wrote, I was both sad and
   happy, and wanted to write something. Think what you think :)
   
Good light,
 Frantisek Vlcek

Reply via email to