Yes it will. Works just the same way. The big trick here is that TTL readings (not P-TTL) seem to be a bit off. With my AF400T I normally dial in about -1 stop for regular flash - so the amount for fill might be greater than you would think. This would be a good time to experiment (strong suit of digital) to figure out just how much to dial in. But yes, can be done.
-- Best regards, Bruce Monday, March 22, 2004, 8:13:56 AM, you wrote: RB> Her FGZ is bust at the moment - so she cant do this so easily. Will RB> using the EXP comp on the body do the same thing when in manual EXP mode RB> on the body? This was what people suggested for the MZ-S? >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 22 March 2004 16:11 >> To: John Francis >> Subject: Re: omg - i have my foot in the door (but now I am scared)... >> >> >> Hello John, >> >> Why do you say that? She is using an AF360FGZ which does >> have flash compensation on it. Instead of dialing it into >> the body, you dial it into the flash (like Nikon and others). >> I used to do as you described with my PZ-1p's and AF500FTZ >> and now do the same with the *istD and AF360FGZ. >> >> I would agree that the amount of flash being used may be too weak. >> >> Tanya, you are aware that the *istD/AF360FGZ combo can do >> high speed flash synch above 1/180 sec aren't you? >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Bruce >> >> >> Monday, March 22, 2004, 2:23:58 AM, you wrote: >> >> >> JF> If you are blowing out the background (or underexposing the face) >> JF> then the problem is that the flash isn't putting out >> enough light. >> JF> Unfortunately this is an area where the *ist-D is nowhere near as >> JF> good as the PZ-1p. With the PZ-1p it's straightforward - >> just adjust >> JF> the flash compensation to dial up the amount of flash >> output. You >> JF> can't do that on the *ist-D. >> >> >> >> >>
