It's far easier to significantly alter a photograph today than it was in days past. That's all he's saying. It's not crap. It's fact.

On Mar 4, 2004, at 3:29 PM, Christian wrote:

His first statement:

"Hockney told the Guardian newspaper that photographs can be so easily
altered these days that they can no longer be seen as factual or true."

is crap!

I've said it before and I'll continue to say it:  ALL PHOTOGRAPHS ARE
MANIPULATED.

It happens before the shutter is tripped with the selection of film, focal
length, etc.


You are seeing what the photographer wants you to see and in the way he/she
wants you to see it.


No photograph can be seen as "factual or true" not even snap shots taken by
grandma.


Christian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: Hockney on photography


Hi,

on my home from work tonight I listened to an interview with David
Hockney about the trustworthiness of photography. Here is an article
about it:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/3532483.stm

I agree with him about art photography, but, like Russell Roberts, I
thought his arguments about factual photography were rather
simplistic. Still, it's interesting to hear him, nevertheless.

--
Cheers,
 Bob





Reply via email to