>In a message dated 2/29/2004 4:52:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/temp/
>difference between the two initially was changing the shutter speed with exposure remaining constant and a difference in focal length. the color and saturation difference was done in Photoshop. taken with *istD adn FA* 80-200 f2.8 in RAW, ISO 200, processed in Photoshop CS. the color fringe artifacts around the bright highlights are interpolation problems in the RAW converter. >Herb... Nice. Nice swirl, nice water. Hmmm, debating saying something -- maybe shouldn't. Think you could have posted it without the technobabble, though. Just let people react. Hehehehehehehehehe. Sowwy. Marnie aka Doe :-) I mean, let's face it, Herb, you can technobabble better than most of us -- so just show us the pics!
