You betcha. This is one of the biggest reasons. That's just not reason for me to pay that much to be an early adopter. OTOH, if next year they come out with $800 *ist D equivalent, then I'm OK with paying some extra for the *ist D this year. But not $3000 +. BTW, the new Canon 1DII looks to be aorund $4000.
Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/29/04 05:04PM >>> Steve wrote: This wasn't comment but a real question. I myslef would never pay $3000+ for a cmaera. The *ist D is about the upper limit for me. REPLY: I would pay more than $3000 for a camera but not a digital one as equal performance could be had at half the price if I waited a year or so....
