To my eye, the FA* 24 is actually displaying more chromatic abberation than the A/24. Am I wrong?
Jeff. -----Original Message----- From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: *ist D A24/2.8 vs FA24/2 comparision? Rob, a sample (center and edge) is published in my *ist D test: http://www.dariobonazza.com/t04p11e.htm Browsing is slow now, maybe the web's got some problems today (or is it just my ADSL provider?). Dario ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:11 PM Subject: *ist D A24/2.8 vs FA24/2 comparision? > Has anyone compared the performance of the A24/2.8 and the FA24/2 on > the *ist > D? > > I'm not all that fussed with the size and the chromatic aberrations (toward the > image the edges) when it's used on the *ist D. > > Cheers, > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >
