Ah, understood. I just thought it was an interesting item- I mean it's the sort of thing you wouldn't normally search for, and figured someone here might appreciate the heads up.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 5:20 AM Subject: Re: rare? > On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Ryan Lee wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 8:52 PM > > Subject: RE: rare? > > > > > > > If it's really flawless and working fine, I think yes. But aren't we > > > supposed to mention unfinished auctions here? > > > > I checked again Alan, it's still got 2 days to go? > > What he said was the opposite to what he wrote: we are supposed to > *not* mention unfinished auctions, as they attract interest. It's > deemed unfair to people watching the item through their own > effort and perseverence. > > Have a look at the archive. > > Regards, > Kostas > >
