As for the gripes he has with it, he might have read my post to the list a
week ago.
Still haven't sold mine tho...:-)
Jostein
-----------------------------
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-----------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:24 AM
Subject: Another review comes online...


> Mr Reichman wades in:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax-istd.shtml
>
> Not an endearing review.  He covers all the relevant points I think, both
good and bad, but seems to do so from an unfavourable predisposition.  Cant
say any of his facts are incorrect, but everything seems tinged with bias,
and I don't agree with many of his handling complaints which is purely
subjective.  Unfortunately one of the major plus points of the ist (its
size) is one of his major gripes so it was never going to win him over I am
afraid.  I still cant believe how people moan about AA batts too - this is a
fabulous advantage.  I can have a backup set of rechargeables for �5 and an
emergency set of liths which last 10 years without losing their charge.
Plus I can use the batts in my flash or nick the batts from there as yet
another backup.  I don't know how the hell he got so few shots with a set of
Alkalines as he says either - must have been a c**p brand.
>
> When I chose the missus digicam for Xmas, I was soo pleased that I could
get one which took AAs and CF cards - great interchangeability with the ist,
and the right choce regardless.
>
> At the end of the day, it doesn't matter what Mr R says if I like it but
his tone was very sour for some reason - perhaps it was just the way I read
it, but it seemed almost like a mission or vendetta to shoot it down.  I
used to get hung up on which one might or might not have the nth degree
better resolution etc - until I got the chance to order one.  The reviews
werent out yet, there was no feedback from owners yet either, but I didn't
care anymore because I liked it and it didn't matter if CanujiKon xxx was
better or worse, because they don't take my glass.
>

Reply via email to