i thought about this too and... nah... can't be.
2000x3000 pixels x 1.5 factor = 3000x4500, quite a bit less than
a good scanner resolution (4000x6000), and i haven't seen much abberation there.
can it be that the sensor has just surface, while the film emultion
has some thickness, that averages the focusing errors for different
wavelengths?


mishka

dont forget that the 1.5X "cropping factor" just magnifies
the abberations over what you would see with the same
resolution sensor "seeing" the whole lens circle. i.e.
you are "zooming in" on the flaws with a APS sensor....

---------------------------------------------------------
 J.C. O'Connell




Reply via email to