> AFAIR you print using a Canon S9000, right? 
If that's 
true, I can only hope
> that the Smooth Gloss is more "archival" trhan the Pearl - I use a S900, and
> my prints on the Smooth Pearl faded after a few days laying in a room - no
> direct sunlight. The black ink turned red :-( Canon's Photo Pro paper wasn't
> that much better in that respect. since then, I've switched to
> Tetenal-Fine-Art-Something-Matte and Epson Heavyweight Matte Paper - they
> offer much more stability. My 2 cents.
> 
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Just proofreading all that, why don't I just post the jpeg!
> 
> Duh! :-) (no dissespect meant)
> 
> regards,
> Lukasz
Hummmm.I have several prints on Canon paper and Ilford semi gloss and pearl that are 
well
over 1 
1/2 years old and now loss in quality with the S800.(My test strips)
I offer a 10 year quaranty with all my digital prints,no one has taken me up yet.

Dave
                                


Reply via email to