I can literally _see_ your point <grin>. I was assuming that you are limited by a total added weight to your hiking gear. If you're willing to carry a 80-200/2.8 zoom lens, this is totally different story and as a matter of fact a ground totally unknown for me.
Boris
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Ramesh Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sticking to just 24mm, 50mm is a limitation for me. My
experience says, using telephoto you can get closer views which you can not get using 24mm & 50mm. Ex: intersection of two mountains. These narrow views
are as intesresting as shots which covers whole
mountain range.
I feel 100mm is not sufficient is limiting at times. I
think 80-200mm is very good choice. I was thinking buying Tokina 80-200mm f2.8.
I used 100mm macro for these http://www.asnowfall.com/Scan/Page19/USVMTP004019.html http://www.asnowfall.com/Scan/Page26/USADRP003624.html http://www.asnowfall.com/Scan/Page32/USNVTP003211.html
Thanks Ramesh
