> -----Original Message----- > From: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Breezebrowser, eh? Better than NeatImage?
I don't necessarily think BB is better than NI, I just don't like how long NI takes, plus I couldn't quite get it dialed in for good results. Generally if an image is *very* noisy I'll toss it. When the inevitable day comes when I have an important shot with a crapload of noise that I need to save, I'll probably use NI. For light noise BB works great. > I've found NeatImage to be better for film > grain reduction than any other thing I've tried The best thing for film grain reduction is a digital sensor in your camera! > > Tom, have you tried BreezeBrowser's noise reduction > on film scans? If so, how does it fare? No, I never did any printing from film scans. tv
