Frank, Deep down I`m envious of your B&W abilities, (not to mention your 24-48) :)! I usually always have B&W loaded in a Spottie, but just don`t shoot it enough, gotta change that. Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California
----- Original Message ----- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:49 PM Subject: Re: Zooms vs. primes > Hi, Steve, > > OOOooooo - a 2.8 (drool drool) - even better. I couldn't remember which one you > had, but I knew you liked it. > > Well, I'm about 90% or more B&W, but I will buy the odd roll of colour for > family and holiday snaps, only to stop the inevitable whining (why didn't you > take colour?), and 'cause it's cheaper if you consider processing costs. > > The rare times that I shoot "serious" (I don't know how to say that without > sounding pretentious) colour stuff, it's been Porta VC, lately. But, on your > say-so, I'll try the Fuji. Thanks for the tip. > > Your 24-48 still not going yet? That is too bad - I'm still loving mine. > That's one nice lens! <vbg> Hope you're able to get yours fixed someday. > > cheers, > frank > > Steve Larson wrote: > > > No, the S1 35-85/2.8. I finally found the film that works excellent with it, > > Fuji NPS 160. Have you tried the 160 yet Frank? Nevermind, you`re B&W > > only. > > Maybe someday I`ll get my 24-48 back :( > > Steve Larson > > Redondo Beach, California > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:25 PM > > Subject: Re: Zooms vs. primes > > > > > S1 3.5 70-210? > > > > > > Steve Larson wrote: > > > > > > > Depends on the lens. One of the main fixtures on my LX is an > > > > circa 1980`s zoom. But you`re right, most were crap. > > > > > > -- > > > "I don't believe in God, but I do believe in pi" - Henri Cartier-Bresson > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "I don't believe in God, but I do believe in pi" - Henri Cartier-Bresson > >
