Perhaps someone could get this list from Brad and post it here. Hoax or not, it might be fun. Paul
Alin Flaider wrote: > > Except for the inflated price, there's hardly something to startle. > > Which leads me to the suspicion this is a hoax. See the sender's > address - abuse something where I doubt anyone will answer to > Pentax questions - while the real sender address is buried > in the headers: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I may be wrong, of course. > > Servus, Alin > > B wrote: > > BWD> PDML > > BWD> Ok, I've got a top-secret sheet of specs dated as recently as June 30th > BWD> 2003 for the *ist D, this may be old news, I don't know, don't follow the > BWD> group. > > BWD> ------ > > BWD> First, for Canadians, it sells for about $6000+ with a lens. [Ouch] > > BWD> 6.1MP [Normal] > > BWD> Sensitivity is ISO 200 to 3200 [where is the 50 and 100?] > > BWD> Interface is USB 1.1 [Why don't they use USB 2.0?] > > BWD> Power Zoom not supported > > BWD> All others supported but some with function limited. > > BWD> 2.7 Continuous/Burst Frame Advance [Not so fast buster!] > > BWD> NO EXTERNAL BATTERY PACKS [Buy bulk AA batteries!!!!!] > > BWD> ------ > > BWD> Those are just highlights, I can forward the complete list if someone wants > BWD> it (hopefully to keep it out of some of the jerks hands for a bit) so email > BWD> me. A brand new flash is also coming out soon for the *ist. I gave the > BWD> reps a hard time on the name, they said they were used to it and didn't > BWD> like it either. I spent a few intimate hours with the 35mm *ist and it's > BWD> ho-hum and ugly. > > BWD> A hello to all the nice people on the list, you know who you are! > > BWD> Brad > > BWD> (BTW, I'm only subscribing to send this email, so I won't see any responses > BWD> addressed to the list)
