Again, I would argue that the good digital photos end up as prints, so you should print both and compare those. Comparing a screen image to a print is essentially useless. It should however, achieve your goal of once again "proving" that digital is inferior.

-Matt


On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 12:14 PM, Caveman wrote:


Thanks to all that replied.

Now I can unveil the purpose of my question. I want to do a 3rd cave film vs. digital test. My intention is to use typical setups for both and compare the quality of the images. I will use P&S cameras for both medias, and compare the quality of images on their respective preffered display media - minilab prints for film and computer monitors for digital (I won't bother with the camera's LCD display).

The cameras will be Olympus MjuII vs Canon Powershot 40. That's what I have readily available at hand. If you guys preffer a zoom film camera, based on the premise that it's unfair to have a prime vs. zoom test, I can borrow some, please choose between Olympus and Canon.

The next question I would like to know the answer is:

What kind of monitor is mostly used, i.e. LCD or CRT ?

cheers,
caveman




Reply via email to