Hi all
What a strange thread!
Someone on this list said: The editors don't care which camera was used, as
long as he likes the pictures.
Why is it so interesting if other people regards Pentax as a pro camera? If
I wanted respect for my camrea, not for my pictures, I'd buy a Leica or
perhaps a Nikon. I use my cameras strictly for taking pictures (allthoug I
like the way they look and feel). Nothing else.
Noone I have been shooting for, ever asked me about the brand I'm using.
More relevant would be to a'm nosk what film, what speed, if I shoot slides
or negs, or which lab I plan to use.
I'm on this list because I use Pentax and have for 20 years. And I'd like to
be able to continue to.
I probably wouldn't use Pentax if it was every pro's favourite. I use Pentax
cameras 'cause they are different and represent another philosophy:
Features are for taking pictures, design is for the pleasure of "wearing" or
handeling it (and maybe for showing off). Pentax offers user interface for
the thinking individual, excellent lenses, high rate of compatibility, great
design, good durability/very high quality at an reasonable price.
I think the "image" of Pentax is changing. The new generation Pentax SLR's
are not going to be "power tools" for the DIY guy or PJ-pro, for that
matter. They are going to be dedicated to people, who enjoy beauty and
exclusive quality (LX2000, Limited lenses), rather than hard core specs with
lots of gadgets, buttons and lights. Quality tools for artistic
photographers who cares about their work as well as their tools. MZ-S
illustrates this well.
Jens
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
