You are dealing with three things here, Boris, not two. Uncoated,
single-coated, and multi-coated elements.

The Takumar you mentioned is not uncoated, but single-coated, almost all
lenses made since WWII were. What coating is is a very thin layer of
antireflection material deposited on the lens surface. Multi-coated lenses
have several layers each specific to a different wavelength of light. These
coatings are usually applied to the glass-air surfaces of the lenses, the
cemented surfaces are usually uncoated.

This was discovered by photographers who found that their old lenses which
had developed a film on the surfaces were more contrasty than new lenses.
They called this "bloom". In the 30s much research was done to find a way to
do this artificially. To the best of  my knowledge, the first consumer
lenses to be factory coated were the Kodak Ektars in the late 1930s.

In the 60's Pentax and Zeiss developed ways to multi-coat optics resulting
in a further improvement. Those two companies still seem to be ahead of
everyone else with improvements.

Coating only really does something when there is flare in the lens. If there
is no flare an uncoated lens works just as well. However in real world
photography there is almost always some flare involved.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: One more question - Lens Coating


> Hi!
>
> Honest, I don't know what I am going to ask <g>. What is the
> difference between coated and uncoated lens? I mean lens construction
> - do they coat each surface, only front and back element? Also, given
> an uncoated lens (such as almost-the-lens Takumar K 135/2.5), if one
> attaches to it coated filter (such as Vivitar VMC Skylight 1A), how
> much would it lower the flare? I suppose I won't be able to shoot into
> the sun like I can do with my SMC FA 50/1.7, but still it is something
> I'd like to learn.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
> Boris Liberman
> www.geocities.com/dunno57
>


Reply via email to