-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 June 2003 17:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rather more than the usual replacement roll...
So much for your paying attention. We all seem to know why. (Except for
the few who keep holding out for some technological marvel to make it
right). The argument is about if it's a good idea.
<Answer>
What argument?
Whether you like crutches or you don't?
It is as you quote, "Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read", just about
sums up all the ramblings here for the past two weeks......
</Answer>
At 05:00 PM 6/10/03 +0100, you wrote:
>From: mike wilson
>Sent: 10 June 2003 15:55
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Rather more than the usual replacement roll...
>
>
>Greetings all,
>
>After a spell in the Mail Archive wilderness, I have decided to
>subscribe normally and see what happens - I'll probably get fired for
>overloading our mail server.
>
>
>Well the archive is completely up the creek so the only subject you
>have missed is the never ending bickering with regard to the crippled
>mount on the Asterix (both varieties). The general gist is, why won't
>my twenty year old lens work on either. The analogue one is crippled
>but who knows about the digital.
>
>Which way is the wind blowing today........
>
>Ziggy
>
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
