On June 5, 2003 11:04 pm, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 5 Jun 2003 at 20:51, Nick Zentena wrote:
> > So it was stacked in favour of the digital. What's new?
>
> Read again.
>
> It was nicely highlighting the inadequacies of mainstream digital
> projection options.
No it was testing a digital projector that cost 2x what the film one did.
That's biased in favour of digital. A fair test would have compared items in
the same general price point. Claiming this was biased against digital is
like the Yankees whining about having to play the big bad Twins.
Nick
